Could The Clergy Act Of 2020 Allow You To Opt Back Into Social Security?

by

I have heard from countless pastors who opted out of Social Security in their youth only to regret it 30 years later. By that time, the idea of retirement has become more of a reality and they realize that they have done nothing to prepare. Apparently, California Congressman Kevin McCarthy has heard the same. In February, McCarthy introduced a bill that would allow pastors who had opted out to opt back in. The bill, H.R. 5904, is also called the Clergy Act of 2020. 

What Does The Clergy Act Of 2020 Say?

The bill, which you can read here, is short and simple. It’s stated goal is, “To allow a period in which members of the clergy may revoke their exemption from Social Security coverage, and for other purposes.” It has been 20 years since the last time Congress allowed pastors to opt back into Social Security.

H.R. 5904 creates a 2-year window starting January 1, 2021, in which clergy can apply to revoke their Social Security exemption. The deadline would be the due date (including extensions) for the tax return of the second taxable year after December 31, 2020. In other words, the due date for your 2022 tax return, which is April 17, 2023, unless you file for a 6-month extension or use a non-calendar tax year.

How Can The Clergy Act Of 2020 Become Law?

Right now, the bill is in the first stage of the legislative process. It was introduced to the Committee on Ways and Means, who will determine if it should be sent on to the entire House of Representatives. If approved by the House, it would then be sent to the Senate. After passing votes in both the House and the Senate, it would go to the President to sign into law.

It’s not quite as simple as it sounds, though. Many bills don’t make it out of committee. Even if the House passes it, the Senate has to pass the exact same version of the bill. If they want to make changes, then it gets sent back to the House for approval. It can be a long and difficult process, especially considering how well our politicians are all getting along these days. On the government’s bill tracking website, Skopos Labs only gives the bill a 2% chance of being enacted. But there’s still a chance.

Should I Opt Back Into Social Security?

No matter the percentage chance assigned, it is a good idea to consider what you would do if the bill is signed into law. Would you take advantage of the opportunity to reenter the Social Security system?

I’ve been asked for recommendations on this. First of all, the decision to opt out is supposed to be made based on firmly held religious convictions and matters of conscience. I do not know what you think and believe and neither can I tell you what to believe. You’ll have to work that out with God himself.

I can only give you tips on how to view it from an economic perspective. Now, the IRS makes it abundantly clear that you are not allowed to opt out for economic reasons. Of course, the proposed bill says nothing about opting back in for economic reasons. 

Whether or not it makes sense to opt back in from an economic perspective depends on your personal situation. If you are 50-years-old and have nothing saved for retirement, you would likely be better off opting back in. Without savings, even just a small Social Security retirement benefit can be a game-changer for you. Remember also, that the Social Security program provides more than just retirement benefits.

If you are young and saving responsibly, you may be better off from a numbers perspective to stay out of Social Security. Devin at socialsecurityintelligence.com ran the numbers and found that it is very possible to end up with more if you stay outside of the system, though you take on additional risk. 

The key words there are “saving responsibly.” If you are young and think you’ll start saving later, then you are a good candidate for opting back in. Because later never comes. Yes, you may get a pay raise when you become senior pastor, but by that time you’ll also have 3 kids that want gymnastics and soccer lessons and 3 meals a day and you will feel like you have less margin then than you do now. 


If you’re unsure how the numbers work out in your situation, I would encourage you to hire a financial advisor to do a complete analysis for you. There are a lot of good advisors out there, but if you need a recommendation, email me because I work with a great one.

0

Do Pastors Need Disability Insurance?

by

Today we are going to talk about insurance, which is a favorite topic of conversation for almost no one. In fact, on a recent road trip, my mom wanted to take a quick nap so I listened to a podcast about insurance to help put her to sleep. I’m sure many of you can relate.

Even though insurance isn’t a very exciting topic, it’s an important one. Especially disability insurance, which is what we are talking about today. If you own your home, you likely have homeowners insurance because your mortgage provider requires it and it’s just smart. If you have a car, you surely have it insured, because state law requires it. You’re probably on top of health insurance, even if you are using a medical sharing ministry. Disability insurance, however, is easy to overlook. It isn’t required by law and the people around you aren’t using it on a daily basis. But it’s very important.

The Purpose Of Disability Insurance

What does disability insurance do? It replaces some of your income if you become disabled and can’t work. It helps keep the lights on and some food on the table if you can’t support your family due to a disability. Insurance never replaces ALL of your income, because then you’d have no motivation to recover, but it makes a big difference in your family’s ability to weather a disability. 

Does a pastor need disability insurance? It isn’t exactly a dangerous job like a test pilot or deep-sea fisherman. What are the chances that you’re going to get hurt so badly pastoring that you won’t be able to work? Pretty slim.

Common Causes Of Disabilities

Disability isn’t just about accidents, though. It is about sickness and mental health issues, too. In that light, pastors may be at even more risk than test pilots and deep-sea fishermen. A 2016 study found that the top 5 reasons for short-term disability claims are:

  1. Pregnancy
  2. Musculoskeletal disorders affecting the back and spine, knees, hips, shoulders, and other parts of the body
  3. Digestive disorders, such as hernias and gastritis
  4. Mental health issues including depression and anxiety
  5. Injuries such as fractures, sprains, and strains of muscles and ligaments

The most common reasons for long-term disability claims are:

  1. Musculoskeletal disorders
  2. Cancer
  3. Pregnancy
  4. Mental health issues 
  5. Injuries (as described above)

As you can see, pastors face the same risks for most of these disabilities (except pregnancy for males, of course) as people in more physically dangerous occupations. And the risks are real.

Your Chances Of Becoming Disabled

What are your chances of becoming disabled? Greater than you think. The Social Security Administration did a study in 2017 that found that today’s 25-year-olds are more than 4 times as likely to become disabled for at least a year before retirement age (27.2%) than to die without a disability before retirement age (5.9%). For a 54-year-old, the chances are a little higher but the ratio is about the same. And yet everyone talks about life insurance instead of disability insurance. 

On average, 5.6% of working Americans will experience a short-term disability of six months or less every year. Most of these disabilities are due to illness, injury, or pregnancy and almost none of these are job-related. Are you convinced of the importance yet? Remember, a 25-year-old has a 27% chance of becoming disabled. That’s more than one out of every four people.

Short-Term Disability Insurance

As I’ve hurled statistics at you, you’ve probably noticed the term “short-term” and “long-term” stuck in front of “disability” from time to time. Any disability that lasts 6 months or less is considered short-term and anything longer is considered long-term. Accordingly, there are insurance policies issued for short-term disabilities and long-term disabilities.

Since I’ve endeavored to impress upon you the risks of disability, you’ll probably be surprised when I say you may not need to own short-term disability insurance. Because of the short-term nature of these disabilities, you may be able to self-insure against them. What does that mean? You can afford a disability without insurance.

I have a 6-month emergency fund, so I would not personally buy short-term disability insurance. If I am disabled for less than 6 months, I have cash in the bank to cover all of my expenses. If I didn’t have that emergency fund, though, it would be wise for me to have short-term disability insurance. 

Long-Term Disability Insurance 

My emergency fund will only last 6 months, so it’s important for me to have long-term disability insurance. I could cover a 3-month sickness, but not a 3-year battle with cancer. That could bankrupt me. 

In fact, studies have found that the leading cause of bankruptcy is medical bills and cancer patients are 2.65 times more likely to file bankruptcy than those without cancer. So, unless you are independently wealthy or have a spouse who can fully support your family financially, you need to look into long-term disability insurance. 

Why Disability Insurance Is Especially Important For Pastors

Social Security provides disability benefits, though the majority of applications are denied. If you are approved for benefits, they aren’t very much. In fact, the average monthly Social Security disability payment is just below the poverty line. For one person. It gets farther and farther below the poverty line the bigger your family is. 

Even though Social Security disability benefits aren’t impressive, they are at least something. It’s nice to have that to fall back on if you aren’t insured. Unless, of course, you’re a pastor who opted out of Social Security. Then you have nothing to fall back on. Ouch. 

Therefore, even if you’re just a pastor who doesn’t do anything dangerous, you need to look into disability insurance. And if you opted out of Social Security, then you REALLY need to look into disability insurance.

0

How Are Mutual Fund Loads Calculated?

by

Last month, we talked about the different kinds of fees that you may pay to own shares in a mutual fund. This month, we are going to go into a little more depth on loads, or sales charges. While they are listed plainly as percentages, calculating them is not nearly as easy as you would think.

How Are Mutual Funds Valued?

First, we need to review a few of the facts about mutual funds. I say review, but this is probably all new for most people. I’ll try to make it as clear as possible.

Mutual funds are actually investment companies. They are companies that buy investments to create a portfolio of stocks and bonds and things like that. Then they sell shares of that portfolio to people like you and me. 

The shares of mutual funds are not traded on secondary markets like stocks and bonds. Rather, you purchase shares directly from the mutual fund company. Because there is not an active market for mutual fund shares, you cannot determine a price based on supply and demand the way you do for stocks. Instead, their price is based on the value of the assets in their portfolio. It is called the net asset value (NAV) and it is simply the net worth of the fund divided by the number of shares outstanding.

How To Calculate Mutual Fund Loads

A lot of mutual funds charge fees, or loads, when you purchase them. The load is not listed as a dollar amount but rather a percent. The percent does not apply to the NAV, though. This is where it gets confusing and a bit misleading. 

The loading charge is stated as a percentage of the offer price, which is different than the actual value of the share. The offer price is calculated as the NAV divided by one minus the load. It’s easiest to show with an example. 

NAV = $20

Load = 5.75%

Offer Price = $20 / (1-0.0575) = $21.22

Fee (Load) = 0.0575 x $21.22 = $1.22

The offer price is calculated so that what remains after the fee is paid is the NAV. Yet, that means that the actual fee paid is a higher percentage of the NAV than the stated load. With the above example, the $1.22 fee is actually 6.1% of the $20 NAV, which is higher than the stated load of 5.75%. 

As you can see, the effective loading charge based on NAV is higher than the stated fee. This is important to remember because every dollar that you pay in fees is one dollar less than you get to invest for growth. Mutual fund fees can have a major effect on returns over the long-run, so we will look into that in more depth next month.

0

How Do Financial Advisors Get Paid? (& Are They Worth It?)

by

As of 2018, there were about 352,000 personal financial advisors in the US. “Financial Advisor” is not a regulated term, so it covers a broad range of services and business models. This article will look at the different ways that financial advisors get paid and answer the burning question, Are they actually worth it?

Commissions

Many financial advisors are salesmen who earn their keep through commissions on the products that they sell. Some will tout their services as “free” because you do not have to pay them anything directly. However, theirs is a business and not a ministry, so it is not free. You are paying them for their services, the money just goes to the financial product company first. 

The problem with this model is that it creates a lot of conflicts of interest. You want the financial product that is best for you and the advisor wants to earn money to feed his family. Unfortunately, those two goals do not always line up perfectly. Advisors are often incentivized to sell certain products based on the commissions they receive instead of how well they meet the needs of the client. On top of that, you usually have no idea exactly how much you are paying the advisor, which doesn’t sit well with me.

Are these advisors worth the commissions they get paid? Some are and some aren’t. Some commissioned advisors merely compare your information to their chart of the three or four financial products that their company sells and tell you to buy the best match. You could do that yourself online without paying such a high commission. And doing it independently, you would have more options resulting in something that is a better fit for you. That advisor is not worth it.

Some advisors are highly knowledgeable and will take the time to sit down with you and get to know your personal needs and goals. They will then research the different options and find one that meets your own unique needs, regardless of whether they could get a higher commission with a different product. This is the kind of advisor that is worth the commission.

Asset Management (AUM) Fees

Over the past 20 years, charging a fee based on assets under management (AUM) has become very popular among financial advisors who don’t want the conflicts of interest inherent in the commissioned sales model. The way it works is that you invest your money with the advisor and they take out a regular fee from the account calculated as a percentage of the account. Probably the most common AUM fee is 1%, which means that if you have $250,000 invested with an advisor, you would be paying them $2,500 a year. 

This model better aligns the interests of the advisor and client because as the client’s wealth grows, so does the advisor’s fee. It is not without conflicts of interest, though. What happens if a client is trying to decide between paying down their mortgage and investing more money? The advisor only benefits from one of the two options but it might not be the best option for the client.

The other problem with this model is that it restricts an advisor’s services to only those who have already accumulated a significant amount of wealth. Many of these advisors have asset minimums, such as requiring at least $500,000 to work with them. It’s not because they are greedy, it’s because they need to keep their business profitable. Advisors must receive a minimum amount of money to make the work of opening and managing an account worth the effort.

Are these advisors worth their fees? Some are and some aren’t. Some advisors transfer your accounts into their management, start collecting their fee, and you never hear from them again. You have no idea what your money is invested in, how it is performing, or if the investment strategy aligns with your goals. These advisors are not worth their fees. But then there are some that meet with you twice a year to review your financial situation and goals. They reach out to you when the market drops to make sure you are okay and regularly monitor and rebalance your accounts to ensure you are on track. These advisors are worth their fees.

Hourly Fees

Some financial advisors don’t want to work on commission but want to be able to work with people who have not accumulated wealth yet, so they work for hourly fees. Fees can range anywhere from $100 to $400 an hour depending on the advisor and the complexity of your needs. The nice thing about hourly fees is that it’s very clear what you are paying and what you are getting for it. There are no surprises and you only have to pay when you actually need help. 

Some advisors shy away from this model, though, because it can discourage people from seeking help when it would benefit them the most. To understand this better, think of a person that doesn’t have health insurance. They get a bad stomach ache but don’t want to pay to see a doctor if it is just indigestion. It continues until their appendix bursts and they end up in the ER. It would have been a lot easier and less painful if they had an ongoing relationship with a doctor that could have caught the problem and prevented the ER visit. People do the same thing with finances. It’s easy to wait until things get really bad to seek help when you could have prevented the problem by seeking help sooner.

Are these advisors worth their fees? Some are and some aren’t. If they give good advice and solve your problem, then they are. If not, then they aren’t.

Flat Fees

The final way that advisors get paid is through flat fees. This could include a flat fee for a one-time engagement or a flat fee for ongoing services. It is different than hourly fees because the advisor doesn’t track hours in order to bill you, they quote you a fee upfront and that is what you pay regardless of how long it takes the advisor. Flat fees for ongoing services are similar to the AUM fee model because you have an ongoing relationship but it is different in that the fees are not dependent upon stock market performance and you don’t have to have investable assets to work with the advisor. 

Like with hourly fees, paying a flat fee cuts down on conflicts of interest. Flat fees are also nice because you know exactly what the engagement will cost upfront and you don’t have to be as worried about the clock as you would be with hourly fees. It can be harder to find an advisor that charges this way, but they are out there and it is a growing movement.

Are they worth their fees? Some are and some aren’t. These advisors can have the same failings as AUM advisors who neglect you and hourly advisors who don’t know what they are talking about. And they can also be absolutely wonderful and help you achieve your goals in a way that you never could have done on your own. 

Are Financial Advisors Worth Their Cost?

As you’ve probably caught on, the answer is that some are and some aren’t. A good financial advisor is worth more than his or her weight in gold. A bad financial advisor is like a bad dentist. You can end up in much worse condition after working with them than you had been in before the encounter. 


Personally, I believe that everyone can benefit from working with a good financial advisor. I know that one and a half hours with a financial advisor drastically changed my life for the better. But I also hear stories about the situations that people end up in after working with a bad advisor and I don’t blame people for avoiding them. Next month, I’ll give you some tips on how to find the good ones.

0